Accountability e desenho institucional: um ponto cego no Direito Público brasileiro

Danielle Hanna Rached

Résumé


O objetivo do presente artigo é propor uma base mais sólida ao conceito de accountability, que seja mais adequada para disciplinar seu uso, especialmente por parte da literatura jurídica, o que pode ser alcançado, metodologicamente, a partir da mobilização de um conceito minimalista para a abordagem, tanto normativa quanto empírica, deste fenômeno. Clareza conceitual é fator indispensável para esclarecer termos genéricos e multifacetados como accountability.

Mots-clés


accountability, conceito, legitimidade

Texte intégral :

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Références


BARBER, S. Welfare and Constitution. Princeton, Princeton University, 2003.

BOVENS, M. Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism. West European Politics, n. 33, 2010.

BOVENS, M. et al. Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration, n. 86, 2008.

BOVENS, M. Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework. European Law Journal, n. 13, 2007.

COUSO, J. Los Desafíos de la Democracia Constitucional en América Latina: entre la Tentación Populista y la Utopía Neoconstitucional. Anuario de Derechos Humanos, 2010.

DAHL, R. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2006.

DINES, G.; MURPHY, W. SlutWalk is not Sexual Liberation. The Guardian, Londres, 08 mai. 2011.

DUBNICK, M. A Moral Being is an Accountable Being: Adam Smith and the Ethical Foundations of Accountable Governance. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MIDWEST POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, 68, 2010, Chicago. Paper […]. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2010.

DUBNICK, M. Seeking Salvation for Accountability. In: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION, 2002, Washington. Paper […]. Washington: American Political Science Association, 2002.

DWORKIN, R. Constitutionalism and Democracy. European Journal of Philosophy, n. 3, 1995.

FEREJOHN, J. Accountability in a Global Context. Institute for International Law and Justice Working Paper, n. 2007/5, v. 1. Nova York: New York University, 2007.

FULLER, L. The Morality of Law. New Heaven: Yale University, 1968.

HIRSCHMAN, A. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Further Reflections and a Survey of Recent Contributions. Health and Society, n. 58, 1980.

KEOHANE, R; GRANT, R. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review, n. 99, 2005.

KEOHANE, R. Global Governance and Democratic Accountability. In: HELD, D; KOENIG-ARCHIBUGI, M. Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Haboken: Wiley, 2003.

KEOHANE, R. The Concept of Accountability in World Politics and the Use of Force. Michigan Journal of International Law, n. 24, 2002.

KOPPELL, J. G. S. World Rule: Accountability, Legitimacy, and the Design of Global Governance. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2010.

KOPPELL, J. G. S. Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of ‘Multiple Accountabilities Disorder’. Public Administration, n. 65, 2005.

MACCORMICK, N. The Ethics of Legalism. Ratio Juris, n. 2, 1989.

MASHAW, J. L. Political Accountability in ‘Real-Existing’ Democracies: Meaning and Mechanisms. European University Institute Papers, 2007.

MASHAW, J. L. Accountability and Institutional Design: Some Thoughts on the Grammar of Governance. In: DOWDLE, M. Public Accountability: Designs, Dilemmas and Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2006.

MASHAW, J. L. Judicial Review of Administrative Action: Reflections on Balancing Political, Managerial and Legal Accountability. Revista Direito GV, n. 1(5), 2005a.

MASHAW, J. L. Structuring a Dense Complexity: Accountability and the Project of Administrative Law. Issues in Legal Scholarship, n. 5, 2005b.

O’DONNELL, G. Delegative Democracy. Journal of Democracy, n. 5, 1994.

O’NEILL, O. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2007.

O’NEILL, O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2004.

PHILP, M. Delimiting Democratic Accountability. Political Studies, n. 57, 2009.

RUBENSTEIN, J. Accountability in an Unequal World. The Journal of Politics, v. 69, 2007.

SCHEDLER, A. Conceptualizing Accountability. In: SCHEDLER, A.; DIAMOND, L.; PLATTNER, M. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2009.

SCHMITTER, A. Real-Existing Democracies: Meaning and Mechanisms. European University Institute Papers, 2007.

SCHMITTER, P. The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability. Journal of Democracy, n. 15, 2004.

SHAPIRO, I. Optimal Deliberation? The Journal of Political Philosophy, n. 10, 2002.

SHAPIRO, M. Deliberative, Independent Technocracy v. Democratic Politics: Will the Globe Echo the EU? Law and Contemporary Problems, n. 68, 2005.

STEWART, R. B. Accountability, Participation, and the Problem of Disregard in Global Regulatory Governance. In: INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL THEORY COLLOQUIUM, 2008, Nova York. Paper […]. Nova York: New York University, 2008.

STEWART, R. B. The Reformation of American Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review, n. 88, 1974.

STONE, B. Facebook, Wall Street: Friends with Benefits. Businessweek, Nova York, 1 fev. 2012.

STUART MILL, J. The Subjection of Women (1869). In: Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, v. 21. Toronto: University of Toronto, 1984.

THOMPSON, D. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2004.

WALDRON, J. Constitution: a sceptical view. New York University Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, n. 10-87, 2010.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v11i1.6745

ISSN 2179-8338 (impresso) - ISSN 2236-1677 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia