A natureza econômica do direito e dos tribunais

Ivo Teixeira Gico Jr.

Resumo


Este artigo explora a natureza econômica do direito e dos tribunais como uma explicação para o problema endêmico de congestionamento judicial. A teoria econômica de bens e serviços é usada para demonstrar que o direito como coerção é um bem de clube, os tribu-nais são bens privados e ambos são bens complementares. Esses resultados são usados para mostrar que as políticas tradicionais de acesso irrestrito à justiça transformam a natureza econômica dos tribunais de bem privado em recurso comum o que gera congestionamento. Tal congestionamento natural decorrente do livre acesso ao sistema pode levar à negativa de acesso efetivo aos direitos, a Tragédia do Judiciário.

Palavras-chave


Congestionamento Judicial; Teoria Jurídica; Natureza do direito; Natureza dos tribunais; Tragédia do Judiciário

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências


Alexy, Robert. Conceito e Validade do Direito. Tradução: Gercélia Batista de Oliveira Mendes. São Paulo: wmfmartins fontes, 2011 [2005].

Armor, David A., e Shelley E. Taylor. “Situated Optimism: specific outcome expectancies and self-regulation.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1998: 309-379.

Austin, John. The province of jurisprudence determined. Edição: Wilfrid E. Rumble. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995 [1832].

Bar-Gill, Oren. “The Evolution and Persistence of Optimism in Litigation.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 8 de Oct. de 2006: 490-507.

Beier, Martin D. “Economics Awry: Using Access Fees for Caseload Diversion.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Apr. de 1990: 1175-1207.

Beim, Deborah, Tom S. Clark, e John W. Patty. “Why Do Courts Delay?” Journal of Law and Courts, Fall de 2017: 199-241.

Benson, Bruce L. The Enterprise of Law: justice without the state. Oakland, California: The Independent Institute, 2011 [1990].

Bielen, Samantha, Ludo Peeters, Wim Marneffe, e Lode Vereeck. “Backlogs and Litigation Rates: Testing Congestion Equilibrium Across European Judiciaries.” International Review of Law & Economics, September de 2018: 9-22.

Buchanam, James M. “An Economic Theory of Clubs.” Economica, New Series, Feb. de 1965: 1-14.

Buchanan, James M. The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Vol. 7. 20 vols. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2000 [1975].

Burbano, Carolina Villadiego. “Bases Generales para una Reforma a la Justicia Civil en América Latina y el Caribe.” Justice Studies Center of the Americas, 2009.

Burger, J. M., e L. Burns. “The illusion of unique invulnerability and the use of effective contraception.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1988: 264-270.

Buscaglia, Edgardo, e Maria Dakolias. Judicial reform in Latin American courts: the experience in Argentina and Ecuador. The World Bank TEchnical Paper nº 350, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1996.

Capelleti, Mauro, e Bryant G. Garth. “Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective.” Buffalo Law Review, 1978: 181-292.

Carvalho, Cristiano. Teoria da Decisão Tributária. Lisboa: Almedina, 2018.

CJF; Centro de Estudos Judiciários. Diagnóstico da estrutura e funcionamento dos Juizados Especiais. Edição: Secretaria de Pesquisa e Informação Jurídicas. Vol. 12. Brasília, DF: Conselho da Justiça Federal, 2003.

Clemenz, Gerhard, e Klaus Gugler. “Macroeconomic Development and Civil Litigation.” European Journal of Law and Economics, 2000: 215-230.

Coase, Ronald H. “The Problem of Social Cost.” Journal of Law and Economics, October de 1960: 1-44.

Cooter, Robert D. “Structural Adjudication and the New Law Merchant: a model of decentralized law.” International Review of Law and Economics, 1994: 215-231.

Cornes, Richard, e Todd Sandler. The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1999 [1996].

Cowen, Tyler. “Law as a Public Good: The Economics of Anarchy.” Economics & Philosophy, Oct. de 1992: 249-267.

Dakolias, Maria. Court Performance around the World: a comparative perspective. Washington, D.C.: World Bank Publications, 1999.

D'Amato, Anthony. “Legal Uncertainty.” California Law Review, 1983: 1-55.

Danzon, Patricia Munch, e Lee A. Lillard. “Settlement out of Court: The Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Jun. de 1983: 345-377.

Dari-Mattiacci, Giuseppe, e Bruno Deffains. “Uncertainty of Law and the Legal Process.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 24 de December de 2007: 627-656.

Di Vita, Giuseppe. “Production of laws and delays in court decisions.” International Review of Law and Economics, 2010: 276-281.

Dixit, Avinash K. Lawlessness and Economics: Alternative Modes of Governance. 1ª. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Djankov, Simeon, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, e Andrei Shleifer. “Courts.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1 de May de 2003: 453-517.

Durkheim, Emile. As Regras do Método Sociológico. 10ª. Tradução: Maria Isaura Pereira de Queiroz. São Paulo: Companhia Editora Nacional, 1982 [1895].

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. 5th. Massachusetss: Harvard University Press, 1977.

Ehrlich, Isaac, e Richard A. Posner. “An Economic Analysis of Legal Rulemaking.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Janeiro de 1974: 257-286.

Einstein, Albert, e Leopold Infeld. The Evolution of Physics: The Growth of Ideas from the Early Concepts to Relativity and Quanta. London: Cambridge University Press, 1938.

European Commission. The 2018 EU Justice Scoreboard . Communication COM(2018) 364 final, European Commission, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018.

Euzébio, Gilson Luiz. DPJ traçará diagnóstico dos Juizados Especiais. Edição: Agência CNJ de Notícias. 20 de 3 de 2012. http://www.cnj.jus.br/noticias/cnj/18646:dpj-tracara-diagnostico-dos-juizados-especiais (acesso em 12 de 8 de 2012).

Fallers, Lloyd A. Law Wihtout Preedent: legal ideias in action in the courts of colonial Busoga. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1969.

Figueira Junior, Joel Dias, e Mauricio Antonio Ribeiro Lopes. Comentários à Lei dos Juizados Especiais Cíveis e Criminais. 2ª ed. rev. São Paulo, SP: Revista dos Tribunais, 1997.

Fix-Fierro, Héctor. Courts, Justice and Efficiency: a socio-legal study of economic rationality in adjudication. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2003.

Friedmann, David. “Private CReation and Enforcement of Law: a Historical Case.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Mar. de 1979: 399-415.

Garner, Bryan A., ed. Black's Law Dictionary . 7th. St. Paul, Minn: West Group, 1999.

Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Anarquismo Judicial e Teoria dos Times.” Edição: ABDE e UCB. Economic Analysis of Law Review (Universa) 4, nº 2 (Jul-Dez 2013): 269-294.

Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “O capital jurídico e o ciclo da litigância.” Revista Direito GV 9 (jul./dez. 2013): 435-464.

Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Anarquismo Judicial e Segurança Jurídica.” Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 2015, Número Especial ed.: 479-499.

Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “A Tragédia do Judiciário.” Revista de Direito Administrativo, 2014: 163-198.

Gico Jr., Ivo Teixeira. “Hermenêutica das Escolhas e a Função Legislativa do Judiciário.” Revista de Direito Empresarial - RDemp, maio/ago. de 2018, 15 ed.: 55-84.

Ginsburg, Tom, e Glenn Hoetker. “The Unreluctant Litigant? An Empirical Analysis of Japan's Turn to Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies, Jan de 2006: 31-59.

Gould, John P. “The Economics of Legal Conflicts.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Junho de 1973: 279-300.

Gravelle, H.S.E. “Rationing trials by waiting: Welfare implications.” International Review of Law and Economics, December de 1990: 255-270.

Greif, Avner. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: lessons from medieval trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Hardin, Garrett. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science, 13 de Dez. de 1968: 1.243-1.248.

Hargis, Thomas F. “The Law's Delay.” The North American Review, Apr. de 1885, 341 ed.: 309-315.

Hart, H. L. A. The Concept of Law. 3rd. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [1961].

Hazard, Jr, Geoffrey C. “Rationing Justice.” The Journal of Law & Economics, Oct. de 1965: 1-10.

Holmes Jr., Oliver Wendell. “The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review, 25 de Mar. de 1897: 457-478.

Kahneman, Daniel, e Amos Tversky. “Choices, Values, and Frames.” American Psychologist, April de 1984: 341-350.

Kelsen, Hans. Pure Theory of Law. Tradução: Max Knight. Clark, New Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., 2005 [1967].

Landes, William M. “An Economic Analysis of the Courts.” Journal of Law and Economics, Abril de 1971: 61-107.

Landes, William M., e Richard A. Posner. “Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.” NBER Working Paper Series, Agosto de 1976: 1-69.

Landes, William M., e Richard A. Posner. “Adjudication as a Private Good.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Mar. de 1979, Private Alternatives to the Judicial Process ed.: 235-284.

Lee, Yoon-Ho Alex, e Daniel Klerman. “The Priest-Klein hypothesis: Proofs and generality.” International Review of Law and Economics, 1st de July de 2016: 59-76.

MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978.

Marchesi, Daniela. Litiganti, avvocati e magistrati. Diritto ed economia del processo civile. Studi e Ricerche. Il Mulino, 2003.

Martins, Pedro. Historia Geral do Direito Romano, Peninsular e Português. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade, 1906.

Mas-Collel, Andreu, Michal D. Whiston, e Jerry R. Green. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

McAdams, Richard H. The Expressive Powers of Law: theories and limits. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2017.

McKenna, Frank P., Robert A. Stanier, e Clive Lewis. “Factors underlying illusory self-assessment of driving skill in males and females.” Accident Analysis & Prevention, Feb. de 1991: 45-52.

Messick, Richard E. “Judicial Reform and Economic Development: A Survey of the Issues.” The World Bank Research Observer, Fev. de 1999: 117-136.

Michlowski, Piotr, e C.B.F. Walker. A New Sumerian "Law Code". Vol. Occasional Publications of the Samuel Noah Kramer Fund, em Dumu-e2-dub-ba-a: Studies in Honor of Åke W. Sjöberg, edição: Hermann Behrens, Darlene Loding e Martha T. Roth, 383-396. Philadelphia: The University Museum, 1989.

Moncada, Luís Cabral de. Elementos de História do Direito Romano. Vols. II - Parte Geral: teoria geral da relaçao jurídica. Coimbra: Coimbra Editora, 1924.

Mousourakis, George. Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition. Auckland: Springer, 2015.

Mueller, Dennis C. Public Choice III. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2003 [2005].

Musgrave, Richard A. The Theory of Public Finance: a study in public economy. Bombay: Tata-McGraw-Hil Book Company, 1959.

NCJRS. Task Force Report: The Courts . Task Force on the Administration of Justice, Washington: The U.S. Pres. Comm'n on Law Enforcement and Admin. of Justice, 1967.

Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971 [1965].

Ostrom. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [1990].

Ostrom, Elinor, Roy Gardner, e James Walker. Rules, Games & Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1994.

Ostrom, Vincent, e Elinor Ostrom. Public Goods and Public Choices. Vol. 2, em Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, edição: Michael Dean McGinnis, 75-103. University of Michigan Pres, 1999 [1977].

Parisi, Francesco. “The Efficiency of the Common Law Hypothesis.” Em The Encyclopedia of Public Choice , por Schneider F. Rowley C.K., 519-522. Boston, MA: Springer, 2004.

Parker, Christine. Just Lawyers: Regulation and Access to Jusitce. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Pellegrina, Lucia Dalla. “Court delays and crime deterrence: An application to crimes against property in Italy.” European Journal of Law & Economics, 30 de September de 2008: 267-290.

Perrin, Benjamin, e Richard Audas. Report Card on the Criminal Justice System: Evaluating Canada's Justice Deficit. Report Card , Ottawa: MacDonald-Laurier Institute, 2016.

Planiol, Marcel. Traité Élémentaire de Droit Civil. 3ª. Vol. Tome Premier. 3 vols. Paris: F. Pichon, Duccesseur, Éditeur, 1904.

Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law. 7th. New York, N.Y.: Aspen Publishers, 2007.

Posner, Richard A. “What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does).” Supreme Court Economic Review, 1993: 1-41.

Posner, Richard A. The Federal Courts: challenge and reform. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1999.

Posner, Richard A. “An Economic Approach to Legal Procedure and Judicial Administration.” The Journal of Legal Studies, Junho de 1973: 399-458.

Priest, George L. “Private Litigants and the Court Congestion Problem.” Boston University Law Review, 1989: 527-559.

Priest, George L. “Measuring Legal Change.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, Outono de 1987: 193-225.

Priest, George L., e Benjamin Klein. “The Selection of Disputes for Litigation.” Journal of Legal Studies, January de 1984: 1-55.

Qazi, Asher A. “Suo Motu: Choosing Not to Legislate.” Em Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court, por Moeen H. Cheema e Ijaz S. Gilani. Islamabad: Oxford University Press , 2015.

Raz, Joseph. The Concept of a Legal System: an introduction to the Theory of Legal System. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997 [1980].

Riggsby, Andrew M. Roman Law and the Legal World of the Romans. 1st. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2010.

Ross, H. Laurence. Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment. Revised 2nd . Howthorne, N.Y.: Aldine Publishing, 1980.

Roth, Martha Tobi . Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. 2ª. Edição: Piotr Michalowski. Vol. 6. Atlanta, Georgia: Society of Biblical Studies, 1997.

Samuelson, Paul A. “The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Nov. de 1954: 387-389.

Schauer, Frederick. The Force of Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 2015.

Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict: with a new Preface by the Author. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981 [1960].

Secretaria de Reforma do Judiciário. Juizados Especiais Cíveis: estudo. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça, 2005.

Shapiro, Martin. Courts, a comparative and political analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1981.

Shavell, Steven. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University, 2004.

Stiglitz, Joseph E., e Jay K. Rosengard. Economics of the Public Sector. 4th. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2015.

The Scotish Government. Making Justice Work: Courts Reform (Scotland) Bill – A Consultation Paper. Consultation Paper, Edinburgh: APS Group Scotland, 2013.

United Nations. United Nations and the Rule of Law. s.d. https://www.un.org/ruleoflaw/thematic-areas/access-to-justice-and-rule-of-law-institutions/access-to-justice/ (acesso em 22nd de June de 2018).

Van Rhee, C.H. (Remco), e Fu Yulin, . Civil Litigation in China and Europe: Essays on the Role of the Judge and the Parties. Vol. 31. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014.

Vereeck, Lode, e Manuela Mühl. “An Economic Theory of Court Delay.” European Journal of Law and Economics, 2000: 243-268.

Weber, Max. Economia e sociedade: fundamentos da sociologia compreensiva . Tradução: Regis Barbosa e Karen Elsabe Barbosa. Vol. 2. 2 vols. Brasília, DF: Universidade de Brasília, 1999 [1920].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v9i3.5988

ISSN 2179-8338 (impresso) - ISSN 2236-1677 (on-line)

Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia